I was flipping around netflix hoping there was something to watch. Then I even flipped on the pay-movie channel. It's all goddamn propaganda.
I finally saw something with Will Ferrel in it. (Everything must go) I was like - well maybe at least it'll be funny, maybe. It's like, he's the only comedian with a job these days for whatever reason.
OMG they totally tricked me into watching that lame-ass movie. It was just about a guy with a nice house in the suburbs and a good, steady corporate job losing it all. He lost the wife, the house, the job, the car, etc. all at the same time.
I mean, my movie choices were between the 'emasculate the rich white male' movie and the 'dragon tattoo glorified lesbian bitch' movie.
Oh jeez - but anyway, will ferrel had an alcohol problem in the movie. He lost his job because he may or may not have sexually assaulted someone when he was drunk one night at a work party. His wife locked him out of his house the day he was fired, and he found all his possession on the front lawn of his house. His bank account had a stop-payment on it. The cops came by and said it was illegal to live on his front lawn unless he was having a garage sale. And the garage sale couldn't last for more than 5 days. So he was forced to sell all his shit in 5 days. He was also forced to withdraw from alcohol because he didn't have the money to support the habit. So obviously, the message was that whitees' big house and suburban possessions are like a drug. and once whitee loses that house and big corporate job because of the NWO, they'll go through a withdrawal process similar to the process of withdrawing from alcohol. Once completely withdrawn, they'll be OK and can get around on bikes and live off fast-food-job income. Professional single women may buy the white man's house in the future, and fat little black kids may get some of the future high-pressure salesmen jobs. Houses and possessions in the future will be for 'winners' who work their butts off and are successful professionally. houses and tons of possessions won't be for any and all white average males anymore. I mean, people will still live in big houses in the new times. But they're gonna have to be competitive fast-talking winners to have all the same shit as 20 years ago.
We stopped the movie in the middle. And started watching Breaking Bad - the only decent thing to watch these days. Breaking Bad's about a 50ish white guy who gets into the drug-trade. He's a HS chem teacher who knows all the chemical reactions and how to cook meth. He gets cancer, doesn't have ultra-cushy health insurance that'll cover all the treatments, so he needs a quick $100-200K for a chance to survive. So he does the drug "cooking", and tries to associate with a few 20ish punks to do the selling and gang networking. Because, he and his wife, are merely a chemistry teacher, and craigslist saleswoman. So there's no way to pay today's modern bills on those normal jobs. Of course, they have run-ins with violent mexican gang members who shoot/kill. Haha - the only thing decent to watch now encourages people to sell drugs. Seriously, the only series that's well shot, well written, great actors, clever lines, entertaining.
Well, people will have less stuff in the future. Get over it already. I'm not into the movies that dwell on this. You can't have normal jobs today and pay for all the sheer amount of crap that was considered "normal" two decades ago. Either sell drugs or pare down the things on the "shit you need" list.
Monday, May 21, 2012
Saturday, May 19, 2012
UN rewards
So the economy's gone international. And it's neatly segmented. The elite decided that the Chinks will make all the shippable plastic shit, the mexicans will sew clothes, the EU will make luxury goods like BMW's and high quality,small trinkets, the US will make microchips, movies and copyrighted online education.
OK if the plan works, then the UN's got everyone by the ShortAndCurlies. What happens if the US suddenly says - "gee, we don't want all your UN-conceived smart growth shit. Go shove it!" Well, then the international elite can go bribe a few dishonest US politicians and murder a few honest politicians, and then slap a giant tax on all imported goods for economic blackmail. And/or they can decide to devalue a local currency. Or they can put trade sanctions on a disobeying country. It's like, if the economy's segmented this way and everyone's dependent on everyone else, everyone's gotta play by the same green rules. Otherwise taxes / regs/ green penalties can be pussy-slapped against the country's face.
If the US says "fuck you UN, we'll just make all our own goods like we did in the 50s", the UN can send it's international 'peace' army in and butcher everyone.
So the elite are having a love affair with China. They think Chinese people and Kung Pao chicken are awesome. Cause the chinese have the one child policy, they live in little apartment boxes, they bicycle everywhere, and they go "Gow Ching Chang Xu Gong Suckee Fuckee 20 cent". So, wow, isn't it interesting that the chinese can make a bunch of shit without a bunch of manufacturing trade regulations and can ship things all over the planet for free and are getting all these low-interest biz development loans?
Well wahtever - the facebook billionaire shows that you can call yourself gook, spic, or whatever you want for tax reasons. So that's how it goes, that's how the games' best played. If the elite like chinese, well I'm chinese and so is my nigger baby.
OK if the plan works, then the UN's got everyone by the ShortAndCurlies. What happens if the US suddenly says - "gee, we don't want all your UN-conceived smart growth shit. Go shove it!" Well, then the international elite can go bribe a few dishonest US politicians and murder a few honest politicians, and then slap a giant tax on all imported goods for economic blackmail. And/or they can decide to devalue a local currency. Or they can put trade sanctions on a disobeying country. It's like, if the economy's segmented this way and everyone's dependent on everyone else, everyone's gotta play by the same green rules. Otherwise taxes / regs/ green penalties can be pussy-slapped against the country's face.
If the US says "fuck you UN, we'll just make all our own goods like we did in the 50s", the UN can send it's international 'peace' army in and butcher everyone.
So the elite are having a love affair with China. They think Chinese people and Kung Pao chicken are awesome. Cause the chinese have the one child policy, they live in little apartment boxes, they bicycle everywhere, and they go "Gow Ching Chang Xu Gong Suckee Fuckee 20 cent". So, wow, isn't it interesting that the chinese can make a bunch of shit without a bunch of manufacturing trade regulations and can ship things all over the planet for free and are getting all these low-interest biz development loans?
Well wahtever - the facebook billionaire shows that you can call yourself gook, spic, or whatever you want for tax reasons. So that's how it goes, that's how the games' best played. If the elite like chinese, well I'm chinese and so is my nigger baby.
Sunday, May 13, 2012
SIDS
Sids is caused by babies breathing in gases emitted from mattresses created by body fluids (puke, pee) mixing with fire retardents. When body fluids mix with fir retardents, they create a gas that hovers right around the top of a mattress. Babies have less SIDS if they're placed in a crib or bed facing up because they'll breathe in less of this gas. New Zealand once had a 'mattress wrapping' campaign where people wrapped their mattress in a polyethylene dropcloth, which trapped the gasses from being released from mattresses, and SIDS was almost eradicated there temporarily.
Polyurethane foam mattresses have the most fire retardants. Polyurethane soaks that shit up like a sponge. If you want to protect a baby from sids, it's best to go with a coil mattress with a waterproof mattress pad that has never been peed or puked on and have the baby sleep with you. Used crib mattresses are the worst as far as sids go. Most babies who die of sids come from the ghetto, are wrapped up in layers of blankets for warmth from the cold, and placed on an ultra-used puked on crib mattress.
Newer mattresses are required, by regulations, to have a lot more fire retardants than older mattresses. The last time I checked, in order for a mattress to pass regs, someone would have to hold a cigarette up to the mattress for 30 seconds before it lit up. Oh wait - now it's 50 seconds LOLOL Sort of ridiculous considering most people don't smoke.
There's a reason I'm a waterproof mattress pad NAZI. I bought one mattress pad after another at Target for $30. But Target tries to cut all these costs by making the mattresss pad slightly smaller than a standard mattress and not having it not pre-shrunk before a wash. The pads shrink, rip up, tear, and are impossible to fit on the bed within a couple of washings. I finally asked my mother in law for a 'good' one from land's end, designed to be washed over and over. The thing cost close to $100. I only have one because of the cost. So when it gets messed up, my mattress is bare until the thing can go thru the wash and dry. I told my sis-in-law about it when she was expecting, and showed her my drop cloth. She kinda listened, but instead spent a ton of money for a real wool mattress since wool doesn't require any fire retardants at all. Too bad her stupid dog peed on the mattress.
Wonder how the elite could get more people to buy those cheaper but more uncomfortable replaceable IKEA foam mattresses... It's interesting - those foam mattresses used to be $30. Now they're $90. Still, the foam's much less expensive than coils.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
FDA is the information police now
The FDA has appointed itself as the science information police. Check out this article. The FDA is now requiring that consumer drug marketing materials and scientific information be SEPARATED. By the FDA's own self-written law, all drug ads must now be based on pure bullshit.
Back a decade or so ago, drug companies would explain the basic science behind a drug to a consumer. They did well at it. They simplified information in a commercial so a consumer could understand the basic mechanism and reason for the drug i.e., - some people have low dopamine levels, and this drug blocks the reuptake of dopamine. This simplified informational form probably helped doctors know what the fuck was going on too.
I was shocked to find one of my favorite websites about my fav product down. I LOVED that website because for ONCE it explained the science behind how it worked and the science behind stem cells. I won't touch anything unless there's a scientific reason backing it up. I am sooooo sick of products with nice-sounding scientific words that don't have the science backing it up.
The FDA is trying to protect consumers by separating marketing and science MY ASS. One time I took a drug that was absolutely amazing. It worked because it filtered stereoisomers. i.e., some molecules have a 'left hand version' and a 'right hand version' that are made of the exact same chemical elements, but are mirror images of each other. Even though they're the same, but reversed in their orientation, often times only one mirror-orientation molecule works. The drug I liked separated the molecules' mirror images, and the changes in side effects for the drug were MASSIVE. Well, the drug company got its little agents out there to tell doctors why the drug was different, and the doctors changed their prescribing habits. It was a real benefit to the consumers who could afford the new/improved filtered version without any side effects and a benefit to that drug company. BUTT - oh no - the generic drug companies complained that the drug company's marketing tactics were unfair. Why? I guess people figured out the drug really was better. From that point on - that particular incident was used as THE example of the big-bad drug companies promoting their expensive drugs unethically at the price of cheaper generic versions.
My autistic brother-in-law has a ton of seizures. If he takes the generic seizure drug, he goes around hitting people, screaming, and peeing everywhere. If he takes the 'designer' drug, which medicare refuses to cover, he can actually live with his parents and not be shut up in some prison cell. He can go into a public store and behave (i.e., not pee everywhere and get violent).
Now, I bet everyone's gonna be on some sort of prescription medicare insurance plan. Those insurance plans want to save money. They don't want to put out more cash for 'designer drugs' even if these drugs work 1,000X better with less side effects. They'd rather pay less money for drugs where the patents have already expired. Insurance companies can probably control the medical drug books and the opinions of idiot doctors. But they can't stop the yapping of consumers who want the designer version of a drug without paying the designer price.
No one's going to be paying out of pocket soon, so I guess the FDA's gonna try to regulate designer drugs anyway it can. Because everyone needs equally crappy healthcare. The bottom line isn't side effects anymore after tort reform swept over the nation; the bottom line is the price.
I was curious, I went to different drug company sites to see if they indeed separated the science from advertising. Yep - NO easy-to-read Science. The drug companies currently just have pdf's of prescribing information and medical information written for doctors.
I love how this is such a HUGE phenomenon IMO, but it's completely unnoticed by people and the media. You can have a product that really helps people, but you're not allowed to explain how it works. LOL You can't even explain the difference between your drug and the generic versions to doctors scientifically and explain why its side effects are different. What are you able to tell people? That a bunch of multiracial people in a picture may have taken it, and that product may have been the reason these people smiled in an ad? Literally that's what drug commercials have turned into - just a series of 'feel-good' shots. Ladies jogging with their dogs, grandparents playing with their kids, people doing yoga outside, fucking two old people in side-by-side bathtubs.
Silly Consumer -- reading science is for doctors. And Silly Doctors -- you're not allowed to think about which drugs are better. Thinking is for insurance companies. Just pick a drug randomly from the list we gave you.
Once the silly doctor starts prescribing a more costly better drug, those new hospital and insurance guidelines will bite them in the ass.
Because, Doctor, you will have two choices and two results in the future when you're paid solely by salary and/or insurance premiums:
Do what book says = Getting paid your salary
Think about which drug is better for your patient = Getting fired and paying student loan bills on your own
Well, oh well. I guess a person can always get on the Net and read consumer blogs and really find out which drugs work for themselves. If they like a drug, they can pay out-of-pocket. Thank goodness we're in the info age, right? Now there's google-like reviews of everything, including drugs, and you can read one after another, simplified user review and get an average star rating.
But, less and less people will be taking the 'designer' drugs and commenting about them. With the FDA breathing down their neck, drug companies will have little incentive to make a drug that's any better than a generic. Maybe the best thing for an 'elite' is to only go to an elite doctor who prescribes THE BEST drugs for Dick Cheney, Arnold Shwartz, and Rockafella no matter what the cost. You'll get what you pay for. Didn't pay? oh, sorry.
Anyways - I think it's true that perhaps there will be stagnation in medical technology until the fucking population numbers get under control. There will be no financial reason for a drug company to improve its drugs until the rules change again.
Back a decade or so ago, drug companies would explain the basic science behind a drug to a consumer. They did well at it. They simplified information in a commercial so a consumer could understand the basic mechanism and reason for the drug i.e., - some people have low dopamine levels, and this drug blocks the reuptake of dopamine. This simplified informational form probably helped doctors know what the fuck was going on too.
I was shocked to find one of my favorite websites about my fav product down. I LOVED that website because for ONCE it explained the science behind how it worked and the science behind stem cells. I won't touch anything unless there's a scientific reason backing it up. I am sooooo sick of products with nice-sounding scientific words that don't have the science backing it up.
The FDA is trying to protect consumers by separating marketing and science MY ASS. One time I took a drug that was absolutely amazing. It worked because it filtered stereoisomers. i.e., some molecules have a 'left hand version' and a 'right hand version' that are made of the exact same chemical elements, but are mirror images of each other. Even though they're the same, but reversed in their orientation, often times only one mirror-orientation molecule works. The drug I liked separated the molecules' mirror images, and the changes in side effects for the drug were MASSIVE. Well, the drug company got its little agents out there to tell doctors why the drug was different, and the doctors changed their prescribing habits. It was a real benefit to the consumers who could afford the new/improved filtered version without any side effects and a benefit to that drug company. BUTT - oh no - the generic drug companies complained that the drug company's marketing tactics were unfair. Why? I guess people figured out the drug really was better. From that point on - that particular incident was used as THE example of the big-bad drug companies promoting their expensive drugs unethically at the price of cheaper generic versions.
My autistic brother-in-law has a ton of seizures. If he takes the generic seizure drug, he goes around hitting people, screaming, and peeing everywhere. If he takes the 'designer' drug, which medicare refuses to cover, he can actually live with his parents and not be shut up in some prison cell. He can go into a public store and behave (i.e., not pee everywhere and get violent).
Now, I bet everyone's gonna be on some sort of prescription medicare insurance plan. Those insurance plans want to save money. They don't want to put out more cash for 'designer drugs' even if these drugs work 1,000X better with less side effects. They'd rather pay less money for drugs where the patents have already expired. Insurance companies can probably control the medical drug books and the opinions of idiot doctors. But they can't stop the yapping of consumers who want the designer version of a drug without paying the designer price.
No one's going to be paying out of pocket soon, so I guess the FDA's gonna try to regulate designer drugs anyway it can. Because everyone needs equally crappy healthcare. The bottom line isn't side effects anymore after tort reform swept over the nation; the bottom line is the price.
I was curious, I went to different drug company sites to see if they indeed separated the science from advertising. Yep - NO easy-to-read Science. The drug companies currently just have pdf's of prescribing information and medical information written for doctors.
I love how this is such a HUGE phenomenon IMO, but it's completely unnoticed by people and the media. You can have a product that really helps people, but you're not allowed to explain how it works. LOL You can't even explain the difference between your drug and the generic versions to doctors scientifically and explain why its side effects are different. What are you able to tell people? That a bunch of multiracial people in a picture may have taken it, and that product may have been the reason these people smiled in an ad? Literally that's what drug commercials have turned into - just a series of 'feel-good' shots. Ladies jogging with their dogs, grandparents playing with their kids, people doing yoga outside, fucking two old people in side-by-side bathtubs.
Once the silly doctor starts prescribing a more costly better drug, those new hospital and insurance guidelines will bite them in the ass.
Because, Doctor, you will have two choices and two results in the future when you're paid solely by salary and/or insurance premiums:
Do what book says = Getting paid your salary
Think about which drug is better for your patient = Getting fired and paying student loan bills on your own
Well, oh well. I guess a person can always get on the Net and read consumer blogs and really find out which drugs work for themselves. If they like a drug, they can pay out-of-pocket. Thank goodness we're in the info age, right? Now there's google-like reviews of everything, including drugs, and you can read one after another, simplified user review and get an average star rating.
But, less and less people will be taking the 'designer' drugs and commenting about them. With the FDA breathing down their neck, drug companies will have little incentive to make a drug that's any better than a generic. Maybe the best thing for an 'elite' is to only go to an elite doctor who prescribes THE BEST drugs for Dick Cheney, Arnold Shwartz, and Rockafella no matter what the cost. You'll get what you pay for. Didn't pay? oh, sorry.
Anyways - I think it's true that perhaps there will be stagnation in medical technology until the fucking population numbers get under control. There will be no financial reason for a drug company to improve its drugs until the rules change again.
Monday, May 7, 2012
austerity option
Francois Hollande to set France on new course after win.
"Europe is watching us, austerity can no longer be the only option," he said.
People drank champagne and chanted: "Sarko, it's over!"
******************************************************************
Great - so the French people didn't choose austerity. They chose the other option. uummmmm... what's the other option again?
Sunday, May 6, 2012
witchcraft to scale
I was listening to loony-bin tim rafit on rense radio. He blathers on and on about the zioneests - but his idea that zio.nsts simply do black magick on an industrialized scale's kinda cool. OK it's hard to take him seriously - but he says that you've got all these freemasonic obelisks lined up on the 'pulse points' of the earth, and they all have these giant quartzes in the center of them. He claims all towns are designed in such a way that the electromagnetic energy from the money flow will center around their financial centers.
Who knows - maybe that the Hebes' trick. Instead of doing bedroom bitchcraft, they fucking do it on a mass scale. Instead of getting a cute little quartz from a local health food store, they get fucking 50 pound quartzes and stick them in huge obelisks. Instead of sacrificing their personal desire, like I dunno, no meat for a month, they fucking sacrifice 10s of thousands of mens' desires to live through a war. Instead of personally visualizing their goal, they'd prefer making 10 blockbuster movies and having 7 billion people visualize their goal. Simple semi-occult principles of accomplishing a goal, but they DO, and they get others to DO on a large scale.
I remember going to the Hoover dam around las vegas. I thought the hydroelectric plant was awesome. What was awesome about it was that it was awesomely simple. The flow of water simply caused few gigantic magnets to spin round and round; and coils that were oppositely charged were wrapped around these magnets. Power lines were attached to the coils. plusses going one way, minuses going the other.
Business is just as simple. More fucking money coming in than fucking going out. Don't overleverage. So, even though you can't open up your own macys and seriously compete because your assets don't compare with the Macy familys', you can use the same principles of business but operate them on a smaller scale. OK so you don't open up a business that generally requires 50 billion in assets, you just open up a business that requires about 10K in assets. Big fish can't swim in small ponds. Big fish can't satisfactorily personalize, or customize, or design for ever niche customer. so anyways, I guess personally I would never think I could start a business like Macys or design a giant power plant like the hoover dam. Or trick a million people to march off to a war. I wouldn't ever think I'd have the ability to grasp the design of BIG machines like those. Maybe the trick for building big machines is to make them simple. just up the scale.
Who knows - maybe that the Hebes' trick. Instead of doing bedroom bitchcraft, they fucking do it on a mass scale. Instead of getting a cute little quartz from a local health food store, they get fucking 50 pound quartzes and stick them in huge obelisks. Instead of sacrificing their personal desire, like I dunno, no meat for a month, they fucking sacrifice 10s of thousands of mens' desires to live through a war. Instead of personally visualizing their goal, they'd prefer making 10 blockbuster movies and having 7 billion people visualize their goal. Simple semi-occult principles of accomplishing a goal, but they DO, and they get others to DO on a large scale.
I remember going to the Hoover dam around las vegas. I thought the hydroelectric plant was awesome. What was awesome about it was that it was awesomely simple. The flow of water simply caused few gigantic magnets to spin round and round; and coils that were oppositely charged were wrapped around these magnets. Power lines were attached to the coils. plusses going one way, minuses going the other.
Business is just as simple. More fucking money coming in than fucking going out. Don't overleverage. So, even though you can't open up your own macys and seriously compete because your assets don't compare with the Macy familys', you can use the same principles of business but operate them on a smaller scale. OK so you don't open up a business that generally requires 50 billion in assets, you just open up a business that requires about 10K in assets. Big fish can't swim in small ponds. Big fish can't satisfactorily personalize, or customize, or design for ever niche customer. so anyways, I guess personally I would never think I could start a business like Macys or design a giant power plant like the hoover dam. Or trick a million people to march off to a war. I wouldn't ever think I'd have the ability to grasp the design of BIG machines like those. Maybe the trick for building big machines is to make them simple. just up the scale.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)